How can we improve the Microsoft Edge developer experience?

WebRTC - WebRTC v1.0 API

Real-time communication in the browser. See also "Web RTC - Object RTC API".

http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/webrtc
http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/webrtc.html

3,636 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Jonathan Sampson [MSFT]Jonathan Sampson [MSFT] shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    20 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • pongphaga2@hotmail.compongphaga2@hotmail.com commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Unfortunately, Internet Explorer doesn't support our new video-calling feature yet. To make a call, open Facebook in Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.

      • Tim MenschTim Mensch commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        A SHIM? David Storey is saying we need to use a SHIM to get WebRTC support?

        You seriously consider this a "WE HEAR YA!" close?! This is completely bogus.

        If someone can write a shim to make ORTC work, then include it in Edge. This is a marketing response; you're clearly not listening to users if you close a feature request with "NO, USE OUR FEATURE INSTEAD! IT'S COOLER!"

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Lets be clear: WebRTC as it is implemented now in Chrome, Firefox and Opera is NOT, I repeat NOT, going to be supported. That is what you are saying isn't it?

      • Lewis PhạmLewis Phạm commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Why do we even bother supporting Edge since they don't listen to us? 2% market share is nothing.

      • Andrew BeavenAndrew Beaven commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Quick, close the voting so it doesn't become even more obvious that developers want WebRTC over ORTC.

      • LucasBCLucasBC commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        "We hear ya!" Huh? Seriously? Hardly anyone is voting for "ORTC". Stick to the standard the other more popular browsers are supporting.

      • AnonymousAnonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Funny how the post by the IE admin starts with WE HEAR YA! When the overwhelming sentiment is that no... you don't hear us. WebRTC is needed now, not later. There is no reason why you would not implement WebRTC 1.0 then expand into WebRTC 1.1. You are pushing users away from your platform with this kind of move, and featuring yourself into irrelevance. Specially since there are other alternatives that work right now

      • former MCPformer MCP commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Is it funny, sad, or scary how only browsers shipped by major content owners refuse to implement a great idea like WebRTC?

      • gtk2kgtk2k commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Confusing and also, there is, because there is also a possibility to vote and think ORTC,
        --See Also "Web RTC - Object RTC API" .--
        I want you to delete the statement.

      • Emiliano MaglioccaEmiliano Magliocca commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I don't know if Microsoft is going to adopt webrtc but we need a livestreaming standard (also encrypted version) for html5, without plugins needed, as Microsoft did with netflix for streaming

      Feedback and Knowledge Base