Web SQL Database
API exposing a SQLite database.
Thanks for the feedback. Since this spec is no longer being maintained by the W3C, we have no plans to implement WebSQL.
(ZDNET) suggests edge adopting Chromium source - WebSQL is expected and welcome.
Company is now targeting non-Microsoft browser client for business applications because of this limitation with MS browser. Since sqlite is now a supported windows component, could you please surface it through Edge
WebSQL is far better then indexDB for server to client sync. Please add so we can start building hybrids for Windows apps that can work offline and not have to maintain two db engines for other platforms
Olle Bröms commented
This feature is awesome. I've used it on one of my hobby sites and the performance, functionality and implementation wise is outstanding. Works in most of the commerical browsers like Chrome, Safari, iOS (safari) and Android (Chrome). Here is an example what I used it for https://mtg.zone/
The reason I went for this feature is the lack of full text implementation in Indexeddb.
Joshua Perry commented
Josh Ross commented
Since sqlite is now a supported windows component, could you please surface it through Edge?
Simon Papworth commented
I have worked with both - And my Offline Web Apps work better with WebSQL than IndexDB. Hey if IndexDB was good enough, then I would use a NOSQL system instead of SQL Server.
Did you known that all programing languages can be expressed as "decrement <memory location> jump not zero" and all WebSQL statements can be expressed with IndexDB - However computer science is trying to create abstractions that enable software engineers to safely build the systems of tomorrow.
Marius Kjeldahl commented
Yes, adding WebSQL would be a very good thing. People can shout IndexedDB as much as they want, but the reality is that it is still not usable across all major platforms (Safari, iOS, *cough*). And until is really is usable across all major platforms, it's hard to say how solid it actually is. Based on my testing the last couple of years, I can honestly say "not very solid". In addition, supporting WebSQL also make it a lot easier to write "cross platform" apps that run both in browsers _and_ "natively" on mobiles, as SQLite is used at least on iOS and Android (with common data models and data manipulation code).
Now that the craze around NoSQL has died down a bit, and even most of the hipsters realizing there is nothing wrong with a simple, proper ACID relational database and SQL to query it, I think it's time the IE team acknowledges that WebSQL is here to stay.
Even if you don't dust off the standard and get the W3 to reconsider the deprecated flag, IE adoption and cross platform (AND DEVICE!) development will benefit from the current spec.
A quick and dirty GitHub search shows 161.000  results for indexedDB.open versus 199.000  results for openDatabase. It's time both Mozilla and Microsoft accept that WebSQL is here to stay and actively used in the wild on millions of devices each day.
For me as a developer adding WebSQL support to IE will mean that I can finally deploy my application on all MS platforms as well, not just on webkit.
Greg the Dev commented
Please support WebSQL in IE. I've also worked on projects where IE use has been deprecated because it doesn't support it. IndexDB for my past projects would have been a non-starter. Now that Microsoft is beginning to become open to ideas that don't perfectly mesh with its business interests, it's time to include it. FireFox made a blindingly bad error in omitting it, but then we've been advising users not to use FF for a while now.
Company is now targeting non-Microsoft browser client for business applications because of this limitation with MS browser.
I agree with what Rodrigo said. It's being abandoned because everybody used the same SQL vendor, but not because the idea is bad. Try working with IndexedDB for highly relational data...
Rodrigo Pedra Brum commented
Actually it "is no longer in active maintenance" as "all interested implementors have used the same SQL backend (Sqlite)". If MS embraces WebSQL implementing it with a different backend the specification should be reconsidered. I vote for adding it.
WebSQL has been deprecated in favor if IndexedDB
Martin Kadlec commented
Still better than IndexedDB
Aaron Powell commented
Why? It's no longer supported as a web standard, there's a big warning saying so.