How can we improve the Microsoft Edge developer experience?

2,173 votes
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    35 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • cg199082 commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        if microsoft worried about webgl will threaten microsoft pc software environment. I will say you are right, but what you done is really tardy. Lightweight application has bigger future. webassembly,websoket,Storage,Web Workers,Webgl all that new specifications indicate web application will have a good future sooner or later, It's just a matter of time. so who hugs these web trends earlier, they will hold the advantage. hope microsoft can realize this.

      • Marc commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        WebGPU is a long way off and like others have stated; on advanced features like webgl 2.0 Microsoft should be at par if not ahead of others. We shouldn't have to back peddle or tell users to go to another browser. You have it supported on android and apple phones and they are other OSs. Surely you can have your own OS supported.

      • Marc commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Absolutely should be pushed forward to get WebGL 2.0 in Edge... This is a powerful tool for web development and shouldn't be stuck in a catch up mode. MS should move this forward and into implementation. It's more than nerve racking to tell a client "Yes you can do that but not in Edge.. You need to use Chrome or Firefox."

      • cg199082 commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Babylon.js v3.2 is already support part of webgl2.0 functions,is that indicates some webgl2.0 functions is necessary ? so why not just support it ? the progress of gpuweb draft is so slow and time-consuming,cannot count on it.

      • Jack commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        I need those FBO's available for everyone, not by extension, but natively. Please. Please. Please.

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Please don't make this another "IE6"-style disaster where everyone is doing weird fallbacks just for edge. Seriously. It's getting mid 2018 and there is still not a sign from the developers.

        Just sad.

      • Raf commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Would be great to have this to be able to play 3D browser games!

      • Graphics User commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        MS needs to add WebGL 2.0 and to support faster performance using ArrayBuffers. Currently my benchmarks show about a 10X slower performance result

      • Anonymous commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Every other browser has support for this, and you are still "considering" it? What are you considering, whether the internett is still a viable platform?!

        Well, I think it is about time we start considering whether Microsoft is still a viable platform.

      • Luke McDougald commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        WebGL 2.0 should be implemented as soon as possible in order to allow PWAs using 3D rendering to only require one rendering code path.

      ← Previous 1

      Feedback and Knowledge Base